Regarding Travis's analysis of the Democratic primary numbers I have this rather uninformed contribution. Under Travis's theory Gephardt should be doing poorly in NH compared to his national numbers. He was pro-war and his support is largely big labor. Right? However, is it the case that Gephardt is the only Democrat running right now that has previously run in NH (was it 1988 as one of the seven dwarfs). If so, how did he do then? Is it possible that he is still benefitting from some residual name recognition/loyalty?
- posted by Anonymous @ 9:40 AM